rigardie
RetroAdept
- Joined
- 2 Ιουν 2006
- Μηνύματα
- 898
- Αντιδράσεις
- 21
διαβάζω στο wiki (αν και ειμαι κατοχος σχεδόν όλον τον μηχανηματων amstrad-τα οποία υπεραγαπάω παρόλα αυτά δηλώνο περισσότερο ZX user λόγω τίς αίσθησης ρετρο που πλέον έχουν)
The Spectrum had the simplest hardware of the three. As a result, it suffered from colour clash and the internal speaker of the early versions had poor sound compared to the C64 and CPC - although later models of the Spectrum shared the AY-3-8192 sound chip with the CPC.
The Amstrad had superior graphical capabilities to the Spectrum, but many CPC games were ported directly from their Spectrum counterparts, resulting in a number of conversions that failed to take advantage of the CPC capabilities and thus hurt the machine's reputation.[citation needed] Even when that was not the case, the majority of CPC titles lacked smooth scrolling due to programming complexities.
The CPC's 80-column display and large install base of disk users made the CPC a more convincing choice for non-games work.
ακούω γνώμες λοιπόν
The Spectrum had the simplest hardware of the three. As a result, it suffered from colour clash and the internal speaker of the early versions had poor sound compared to the C64 and CPC - although later models of the Spectrum shared the AY-3-8192 sound chip with the CPC.
The Amstrad had superior graphical capabilities to the Spectrum, but many CPC games were ported directly from their Spectrum counterparts, resulting in a number of conversions that failed to take advantage of the CPC capabilities and thus hurt the machine's reputation.[citation needed] Even when that was not the case, the majority of CPC titles lacked smooth scrolling due to programming complexities.
The CPC's 80-column display and large install base of disk users made the CPC a more convincing choice for non-games work.
ακούω γνώμες λοιπόν
) και θα ηταν αργοοοοοοοοο και τ ε τ ρ α γ ω ν ι σ (χασμουρητο) μ ε ν οοοοοο
